data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4e0f5/4e0f5752a59af227120f4c5813b3cf69c66fafd2" alt=""
I know this is late but awhile back the GoogleEarth
launched the YouTube layer. Does anyone else have a problem with how poorly most of these videos are georeferrenced? We had discussed this idea a bunch working on the California
MLPA. After browsing the layer in GE while looking at the
layer that
GreenInfo put together I was bummed. There's some pretty good stuff but most of it is noise landing way out in the ocean. Take a look at Pt Reyes - lots of concert footage...that's neat. Just the type of thing to make people who are inherently skeptical of the usefulness of this to write it off. Not mention that I geotagged my
video of Bolinas almost two years ago and its not picked up by the layer. What's up?
No comments:
Post a Comment